Paul, 78, retired from the the House of Representatives in January, roughly at the time the U.S. government finally decided to create formal policies on bitcoin. This week, Paul took to popular Q&A site Quora to once again explain his position on bitcoin.
Not surprisingly, Paul said that the U.S. has a “terrible monetary system” where the central banks and government “purposely counterfeits and debases” currency. As a result, he believes that there should be “no prohibitions” on creating substitutes for U.S. currency, which he believes benefits only the “cartel running our monetary system” for the benefit of a privileged few. Bitcoin, he notes, is one tool for redressing these grievances.
This doesn’t mean, however, that Paul is a unabashed bitcoin believer.
Though I don’t personally believe that Bitcoin is true money, it should be perfectly legal and there should be no restrictions on it, there should be no taxes on it. The people who operate Bitcoin would, of course, be prohibited from committing fraud but the people should be able to have competition whether it is a basket of commodities or crypto-currencies – it should be perfectly legal.
Paul also expressed concern that “government ultimately wants to curtail the Internet” and that bitcoin regulation would simply be one step in that direction.
Although the post is Paul’s first public comment on bitcoin in the wake of new IRS rules treating it as a taxable commodity, it’s essentially the same position he’s held on bitcoin and other non-governmental currencies for the past several years. Often called the “intellectual godfather” of the Tea Party movement, Paul is broadly opposed to many government policies involving taxes.